Loudmouth Lineker hurled ugly slurs at me and got away with it. So will the BBC now grasp the nettle and sack him, asks broadcaster NANA AKUA
- Nana Akua writes of her clash with BBC’s Gary Lineker after targeted tweet
- Ms Akua had shown support for Priti Patel’s migrants policy in autumn of 2021
- Mr Lineker posted clip online accusing Ms Akua of showing a ‘lack of empathy’
In the autumn of 2021, I became embroiled in a deeply distressing situation: facing a grotesque and, it seemed, unending stream of targeted abuse on social media, including racist slurs and death threats.
My crime? I had dared to speak out on a TV talk show in support of then Home Secretary Priti Patel’s commitment to turning back migrants who were arriving on our shores in their tens of thousands every year.
It is a position shared by millions across the country, of course – but one the Left often regard with haughty disdain. Inevitably, one of their most self-promoting halo-polishers was quick to condemn my views in the most personal terms.
Together with an edited video clip of my comments, Gary Lineker tweeted to his army of fanatical followers (standing at more than eight million today) accusing me of an ‘extraordinary lack of empathy for our fellow human beings’.
He ended with a simple slur: ‘Vile.’
This felt to me like bullying – and inevitably resulted in an onslaught from his screeching fans, which still shocks me to this day.
In the autumn of 2021, Nana Akua (pictured) became embroiled in a deeply distressing situation: facing a grotesque and, it seemed, unending stream of targeted abuse on social media, including racist slurs and death threats
This extraordinarily rich and powerful white man, who prides himself on his achingly liberal ‘be kind’ outlook, was using his influence to shout down a black woman of considerably less power – and in effect throwing me to the wolves of social media.
I’m hardly a shrinking violet, but I thought it was deplorable. I believed strongly that Lineker’s personal attack had strayed way beyond the impartiality he is meant to adhere to as the BBC’s highest earner – currently on a preposterous £1.35million per year.
But of course, this wasn’t his first offence. Sometimes it feels like barely a week goes by without Loudmouth Lineker signalling his woke credentials.
I wrote to Lineker’s boss, BBC head of sport Philip Bernie, as well as the BBC’s overall chief Tim Davie to complain. Their responses were little short of a fob-off. Formal complaints to the BBC’s in-house department were treated in a similarly dismissive fashion.
Bernie claimed Lineker had merely given his ‘personal response’ to my views. ‘There was no intention of provoking any abuse,’ he added.
Rubbish. Lineker is an obsessive social media performer: I cannot believe that he would not have predicted precisely what happened. And it’s telling that he didn’t take the post down.
There was further hypocrisy at play, too.
I believed strongly that Lineker’s personal attack had strayed way beyond the impartiality he is meant to adhere to as the BBC’s highest earner writes NANA AKUA
As a freelancer, rather than a member of the BBC’s staff, Lineker was not a full-time employee when he unleashed his partisan attack on me. Yet nor was I when, three years earlier, I had been severely reprimanded by the BBC after making a series of comments on talk shows while I was also contracted to present some of the Beeb’s religious and mental health programming.
For example, during an interview with Jeremy Vine on his Channel 5 show, I’d suggested that paedophiles should be given the death penalty. It was a strong statement, yes, and – as the BBC made clear to me in extremely frank terms – it had broken their impartiality rules.
As a result, I was eventually stripped of two of the six programmes I hosted for Auntie. I can’t say I wasn’t cross, but I accepted it. The BBC was within its rights.
But why, when Lineker treated me with such partisan thoughtlessness, did the same not apply to him?
Undoubtedly, he is a big beast at the BBC with a big ego to match. But this special dispensation he apparently receives has got to stop. Otherwise it makes a mockery of the BBC’s claims to ‘impartiality’ – and insults millions of licence fee payers.
Source: Read Full Article